> "Developers" don't "need" to agree with your stance Which in turn is your moral stance. > Would you rather someone gets addicted to Candy Crush or to alcoho

> "Developers" don't "need" to agree with your stance Which in turn is your moral stance. > Would you rather someone gets addicted to Candy Crush or to alcohol? I'd rather have those "receptors" occupied by things that make people deeply happy while they do them, and then not make them cringe when they think back to them. That is, I'm assuming there is a certain lust for life and growth which can get hijacked and misdirected by addictions. Sure, what is an addiction may not so much depend on the activity as why and how it's done, and of course I can't draw the line for others; but on the other hand, let's not pretend there is no such line, or that there is no problem worthy of discussion.