He writes: "Mathematics is an excellent proxy for problem-solving... Mathematics, by its concise and logical nature, lends itself to problem-solving (it is not

He writes: "Mathematics is an excellent proxy for problem-solving... Mathematics, by its concise and logical nature, lends itself to problem-solving (it is not unique in this regard)." But how can we be sure this is true if is unable to read what he wrote? Maybe I'm thinking about the way Clojure programmers tend to use the word "concise" -- concise is meaningful only if it contributes to readability. Otherwise the more accurate description is "terse". And terse does not lend itself to problem solving.