3 ms·
I'm just a bystander, but: the paper mentions another, weaker signal in the time period they wrote up (18 days IIRC). That one had an estimated false-signal rat
by abecedarius 11y ago
I'm just a bystander, but: the paper mentions another, weaker signal in the time period they wrote up (18 days IIRC). That one had an estimated false-signal rate of once in a couple years (the main one was more like once a century).
- kgwgk 11y ago> (the main one was more like once a century). More like once in 200'000 years, actually.
- abecedarius 11y agoThanks.