3 ms·
Does anyone have an opinion on Spacemacs[0]? I haven't used it, nor Vim/Emacs. Just came across it during researching the two. Spacemacs appears to have excell
by rl3 11y ago
Does anyone have an opinion on Spacemacs[0]?
I haven't used it, nor Vim/Emacs. Just came across it during researching the two. Spacemacs appears to have excellent documentation though.
[0] http://spacemacs.org/ http://spacemacs.org/
- 001spartan 11y agoI've been a vim user for a few years (I wouldn't consider myself a power user, though). I switched to Spacemacs last year, and I don't regret it at all. The power of the Emacs ecosystem mixed with excellent hotkeys (on top of vim's better keybinds already) is a formidable combination.
- Barrin92 11y agoI switched from vim to spacemacs a few weeks ago and I don't regret it. The fact that you can run a shell in a buffer, have on the fly syntax checking and so on makes coding much more comfortable and you feel like you're using a full blown ide instead of just a text editor. Would recommend
- arvinsim 11y agoFunny that, I also did the same exact thing this month for org-mode. I never missed Vim.
- TurboHaskal 11y agoI wholeheartedly recommend it. I was a Vi(m) user for years. I love vi as a concept, but extending it always felt very wrong and cumbersome for me, whereas in Emacs it all feels natural as it truly is the extensible, customizable text editor. org-mode and slime made me pull the trigger and kept using it for half a decade. Then I lost my Emacs config. Installed Spacemacs and never looked back. It gives you better defaults, a good community and a framework that lets you easily extend it in a more modular way using layers. It's also much gentler on my wrists. I still use nvi for quick edits though.