4 ms·
Your comment raises the question: if a substantial profit is involved is a claimant still "impartial", "neutral", "unbiased"...? Or, "external" to the proceedi
by Outdoorsman 11y ago
Your comment raises the question: if a substantial profit is involved is a claimant still "impartial", "neutral", "unbiased"...?
Or, "external" to the proceedings, as your choice of terms suggests...?
I don't have the answer....still thinking about this one!
You make a good point...
- ves 11y agoThe hope is that a company's fate isn't decided by the claimant. Of course the claimant is biased, that's what would have motivated them to take this position in the first place. The ultimate decision should be reached by an unbiased third party or parties, in this case the FTC / the market.