3 ms·
pfffft... the first line shows an extremely limited world view. Plenty of people are creating using smartphones. Sure, no one is programming on a smartphone, b
by cowsandmilk 11y ago
pfffft... the first line shows an extremely limited world view.
Plenty of people are creating using smartphones. Sure, no one is programming on a smartphone, but plenty of people are creating art via the cameras and on-device editing tools. And doing so much more spontaneously than when you had to awkwardly carry around a camcorder waiting for inspiration to hit.
Similarly, lots of people only use PCs for consumption. It is their reddit/hulu/netflix device.
Both PCs and smartphones are used for creation, just for different types of creation.
- lottin 11y agoYes I see people taking pictures with their phones but do you really call this creating art? I think it gives them the _illusion_ that they're creating something, and maybe that makes them happy, but personally I think it's an act of self-delusion, and quite annoying too.
- vinay427 11y agoI would agree with this. From my experience, most people in my demographic use smartphone cameras for sharing moments on Facebook, Snapchat, etc. which directly fuels content consumption. Relatively few seem to really aspire to be hobbyist photographers.
- tommorris 11y agoYeah, before the smartphone, all photography was serious. Nobody wandered around with a 35mm compact taking photos of their friends and family and holidays in Disneyland. Everyone was trying to make great works of art with their cameras.
- tommorris 11y agoBetter email the Smithsonian and tell them to take all that photography out of the American Art Museum. Ansel Adams was merely under the illusion that he was creating something, but it was just an annoying act of self-delusion. Photography isn't really proper art, especially if done using a smartphone, right?