I agree. When the return type changes now you'd have to change every spot it's called regardless if the return value is used or not. This would be very annoyi

I agree. When the return type changes now you'd have to change every spot it's called regardless if the return value is used or not. This would be very annoying if you don't have a refactor function in your IDE or if the ammount of changes crosses a company policy trigering a full program test taking days of your time, etc. The original function name was named poorly however.