4 ms·
I took a look at the LLVM preset and it looked like you had to pass object handles to static functions. I'd prefer to have an actual, say, LLVM::Module equivale
by jevinskie 11y ago
I took a look at the LLVM preset and it looked like you had to pass object handles to static functions. I'd prefer to have an actual, say, LLVM::Module equivalent object in Java that you can call member functions on. Are all the presets like this?
- agibsonccc 11y agoI would bring it up with the project maintainer. He's based in Japan(time zone) but I flagged this thread for him for when Japan is awake.
- bytedeco 11y agoNo, that's because in the specific case of LLVM only the C API is currently mapped. We'd have to work a little bit harder for the C++ API, but there is interest in doing so, if only to use it as a better parser for JavaCPP itself: Improve Parser: Use the Clang API https://github.com/bytedeco/javacpp/issues/51 https://github.com/bytedeco/javacpp/issues/51