4 ms·

> Things are probably the other way around. Don't take the job if you think that you will be easily replaceable. In that case, take another job. So if you appl

> Things are probably the other way around. Don't take the job if you think that you will be easily replaceable. In that case, take another job. So if you apply for a position at Google and they offer you a job that suits your skill set and background you should not take the job because Google potentially has a list of thousands of people they could replace you with? wat? > Never apply for a "job". Always apply for a project, or rather, do your own project, if you can. What matters, is what the project at hand is all about, and if you have the ability to do it. Discussing unrelated issues about credentials or unrelated previous experience, is a sign that the person in front of you has time to waste; his own time, but also yours. That is a red flag. If you apply for a position and the company is not interested in your experience or previous projects then I'm fairly confident of two things. a) The company is a sweatshop and burns through junior developers like tissue paper to flame. b) The work you will be doing will be the worst sort of low skill crap work that no one with a half way decent resume and experience wants to do.

gizi 11y ago
> So if you apply for a position at Google and they offer you a job that suits your skill set and background you should not take the job because Google potentially has a list of thousands of people they could replace you with? wat? Yes, exactly. If it is trivially easy to find thousands of people with your skill set and background, there is something wrong with that skill set and background. You will need to work on it, because these things are an accident waiting to happen. > a) The company is a sweatshop and burns through junior developers like tissue paper to flame. Not really. They have a real problem and they cannot readily find someone to solve it. And then you come along. Now the problem may finally get solved. This is how it best works. If not, there is something wrong with the entire situation. > b) The work you will be doing will be the worst sort of low skill crap work that no one with a half way decent resume and experience wants to do. If you do not have a pretty much unique selling proposition, you will indeed compete at the bottom of the market. You need the ability to solve a particular type of non-trivial problems and you must preferably have been specializing for years in doing that. People in your field understand what the value proposition is, and there is no need to endlessly debate this with them first. Google do not use the technology in which I specialize. One day they may, but at the moment, they don't. So, I would never run into them, when occasionally looking for a project (once every 3 - 5 years). The day that Google starts using this technology, they could indeed try to ask me for an interview, but why would I prefer them to the established players? Am I replaceable? Yes, but Google are even more replaceable. I will have done fine for years, before they decided to enter the field too. Who exactly is the one that is replaceable here?

gizi 11y ago

> So if you apply for a position at Google and they offer you a job that suits your skill set and background you should not take the job because Google potentially has a list of thousands of people they could replace you with? wat? Yes, exactly. If it is trivially easy to find thousands of people with your skill set and background, there is something wrong with that skill set and background. You will need to work on it, because these things are an accident waiting to happen. > a) The company is a sweatshop and burns through junior developers like tissue paper to flame. Not really. They have a real problem and they cannot readily find someone to solve it. And then you come along. Now the problem may finally get solved. This is how it best works. If not, there is something wrong with the entire situation. > b) The work you will be doing will be the worst sort of low skill crap work that no one with a half way decent resume and experience wants to do. If you do not have a pretty much unique selling proposition, you will indeed compete at the bottom of the market. You need the ability to solve a particular type of non-trivial problems and you must preferably have been specializing for years in doing that. People in your field understand what the value proposition is, and there is no need to endlessly debate this with them first. Google do not use the technology in which I specialize. One day they may, but at the moment, they don't. So, I would never run into them, when occasionally looking for a project (once every 3 - 5 years). The day that Google starts using this technology, they could indeed try to ask me for an interview, but why would I prefer them to the established players? Am I replaceable? Yes, but Google are even more replaceable. I will have done fine for years, before they decided to enter the field too. Who exactly is the one that is replaceable here?