4 ms·
Some say (for example Moore) that arithmetic is only a tiny part of programming and don't deserve special syntax (especially with a language that lacks C-style
by FenugreekAcerb 11y ago
Some say (for example Moore) that arithmetic is only a tiny part of programming and don't deserve special syntax (especially with a language that lacks C-style for loops).
- Terr_ 11y ago...Well, a tiny part of whose programming? Programming languages (at least the not-so-academic kind) need to mesh with the problem-spaces being solved, and there are definitely some contexts where most of the work is encoding and applying arithmetic rules.
- ktRolster 11y agoReally all you need for programming are > < + - . , [ ] Anything more than that is for wimps. Brain is the only language I ever program in.
- slang800 11y agoI think you mean "Brainfuck", I can't find a programming language called "Brain".
- ktRolster 11y agoI haven't been posting here long, so I wasn't sure if it was acceptable to type 'fuck.' So I self-censored by replacing it with asterisks, which hackernews promptly ate. So yes, you are right of course.
- akkartik 11y agoEach pair of asterisks turned into an empty italic block due to HN's formatting rules. You can see them if you view source :)