4 ms·
No, the current title lacks any description of the piece in question. (Other than on containing an offensive word.) I think a title should be able to stand alon
by epochwolf 17y ago
No, the current title lacks any description of the piece in question. (Other than on containing an offensive word.) I think a title should be able to stand alone to some degree.
I see the author's intent to stampete through any prudishness surrounding the term but I think a more description title including the title would be better.
Possiblities.
* Analysis of Fuck
* Fuck: Legalities and Taboos
* Fuck: First Amendment, broadcast regulation, sexual harassment, and education
(This comment has been edited a couple of times to get my idea across, sorry about that)
- nostrademons 17y agoI'd be more likely to read it if it was just "Fuck" (it makes me curious), and then I'd be more likely to upvote it once I saw that that actually is an appropriate title for it.
- yannis 17y agoI had exactly the same idea with you - before I read the article. However, I changed my mind after reading it and pondering over some of his writings. For example fucking brilliant will not offend but fucking idiot will and then that donkey stuff threw me totally out.