3 ms·
Watched it - it was ok. Nice relaxing tone/pace. He basically argues that if one person is in charge (has final cut), the product will be as good as their tas
by cookingrobot 17y ago
Watched it - it was ok. Nice relaxing tone/pace.
He basically argues that if one person is in charge (has final cut), the product will be as good as their taste. If no one is in charge and decisions are made by consensus / bureaucracy, then the result will be as bad as the worst persons taste.
The test for whether you really have final cut is whether you'd get to release something that is crazy and no one else agrees with. Ex. the ending of the Sopranos.
His advice is that if you don't have official final cut, but you know that you're right about something, you can "take" final cut by making your way the only viable option. Ex. Hitchcock planned meticulously and only filmed enough footage to make exactly the movie he wanted, with nothing extra that the studio could use to edit it and make it worse.