3 ms·
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychologie/Psy_II/beautycheck/english/schemaanpassungen/m(1-4)-g_an_m(1-32)-s.jpg http://www.uni-regensbur
by j_baker 17y ago
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychologie/Psy_II/beautycheck/english/schemaanpassungen/m(1-4)-g_an_m(1-32)-s.jpg http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychol...
http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychologie/Psy_II/beautycheck/english/schemaanpassungen/m(1-4)-s_an_m(1-32)-g.jpg http://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil_Fak_II/Psychol...
I don't think you can make this observation from these two faces. There appear to be differences in terms of hair and eye color as well. Plus, the facial hair isn't as visible in the smoothed-out face. I may be being pedantic in pointing the second point out, but I still think it says that there's more involved here than just the skin.
Not to mention that the skin color appears to me to "dull" some of the sharper features of the face by making them less noticeable. I think a case can be made that skin can have an enhancing effect on an average face, but I don't think this is enough to write facial structure out altogether.
- raptorex 17y agoyeah, well does "attractiveness" of a 2d picture of a face that looks like it was computer generated (the second male picture) as compared to an actual person's face actually correlate to physical attraction in the real world? I don't think you're being overly pedantic.