>But violating rights in one case makes it more likely that rights will be violated in other cases. So find another way to punish it. Why should that get some

>But violating rights in one case makes it more likely that rights will be violated in other cases. So find another way to punish it. Why should that get some off of a criminal charge. Most of world has no such rule. And the point of a good-faith exemption is because allowing good-faith fucks up to be used as evidence doesn't increase (much) the likelihood of violations. >Better to let one guilty person go free than to injure and possibly lock up a hundred innocent people. But throwing out ill gotten evidence after it was obtained doesn't decrease the chances of locking up innocent people.