4 ms·
As long as its a webcam-per-suspect-per-place-of-business basis and not a mass grab to do this across entire geographical areas it seems fine. That's the probl
by dsp1234 11y ago
As long as its a webcam-per-suspect-per-place-of-business basis and not a mass grab to do this across entire geographical areas it seems fine.
That's the problem right there though. The FISC has already ruled that if there is no constitutional issue with a single targeted act, then adding more and more acts together can't create a constitutional issue out of whole cloth.
In other words, if it's OK to do it with one person as a target, then it's OK to do it to everyone as a target.
"Put another way, where one individual does not have a
Fourth Amendment interest, grouping together a large number of similarly-situated
individuals cannot result in a Fourth Amendment interest springing into existence ex
nihilo. "[0]
[0] - http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/BR%2013-109%20Order-1.pdf http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/BR%2013-109... page 9, paragraph 1