5 ms·
You would per core licensing, not Server + CAL licensing for the SQL Server. https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/server-cloud/products/sql-server/purchasing.aspx h
by UK-AL 11y ago
You would per core licensing, not Server + CAL licensing for the SQL Server.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/server-cloud/products/sql-server/purchasing.aspx https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/server-cloud/products/sql-se...
I thought this would be obvious, since Server + CAL Licensing would make any public site unfeasible, and there are many large sites running on the windows stack.
- polskibus 11y agoBut you also need CALs for the Windows Server your database sits on.
- UK-AL 11y agoExternal connector lisence. Also I read some Ms documentation that a windows server that runs the database for web workloads may acutally come under web workload. I can't remember that document however.
- polskibus 11y agoI don't remember exact number but external connector license is equal to a cost of hundreds if not thousands of CALs. If you come across that document, I'd be grateful for a URL.