4 ms·
Of course you're right that we do need to support SVG and vector formats, but it's also not entirely true that "vector >> raster" in all cases. Raster does hav
by pwang 11y ago
Of course you're right that we do need to support SVG and vector formats, but it's also not entirely true that "vector >> raster" in all cases.
Raster does have limited resolution, but so does your screen or most output devices (yes, even scientific plotters).
It's also not necessarily true that it has a higher storage footprint; it depends on the complexity and number of glyphs, the fonts you need to embed for the LaTeX formulae, etc. etc. In large-data cases, raster can be a much more viable visualization transfer medium.
- andrepd 11y agoThat's true, in practical uses a sufficiently high res raster is indistinguishable from a vector image. Still, it would be nice to have that option.