3 ms·

What are you referring to?

• coddingtonbear 11y ago
  I'm supposing he's referring to the public dispute Paul Graham and Michael Church have been having for some time.
  • trafficjam30125 11y ago
    Yes, that idiocy. Of course, Graham himself looks clean because he leans on his attack dogs.
  • dang 11y ago
    There's no such 'dispute'. It's 100% imaginary.
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • consz 11y ago
      Is this why michaelochurch account hasn't been posting as much lately? I always thought that was the most interesting user that posted here, why push him away?
      • dang 11y ago
        We banned michaelochurch because of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10017538 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10017538 after a long history of abusing this site and countless requests to stop. Since then he's made up all kinds of things, such as the comment upthread.