3 ms·
I thought the license was incompatible? Also, what does this mean for BTRFS?
by melted 11y ago
I thought the license was incompatible? Also, what does this mean for BTRFS?
- ferrari8608 11y agoThe license does not allow for ZFS to be included in the kernel. It runs in user space.
- melted 11y agoThen perf will likely suck.
- ferrari8608 11y agoThat really just depends on the configuration. NTFS-3G has done pretty well in user space, so there's no reason ZFS can't.
- melted 11y agoNTFS-3G didn't have to perform well at NVME latencies and speeds. This has to, to be taken seriously.
- cballard 11y agoI don't know much about Linux kernel architecture, but could it be a separate binary loaded at runtime by the kernel, so that it's not actually part of the kernel?
- melted 11y agoThat's how http://zfsonlinux.org/ http://zfsonlinux.org/ approaches it. Maybe Ubuntu will just package it in the standard distro. That'd be a bit underwhelming if that's what it is. From what little I know about ZFS, its designers basically thought that traditional layering of how storage is approached in UNIX didn't make sense, so they re-did much of it from scratch. As a result, ZFS doesn't really natively fit as a pluggable filesystem.