He didn't compare the publisher to nazis. He talked about one of the essential components that allowed the nazis to have power in germany. The nazis existed.

He didn't compare the publisher to nazis. He talked about one of the essential components that allowed the nazis to have power in germany. The nazis existed. They were real. I don't like the modern fad of holocaust revisionism that says "anyone who talks about the nazis is ipso facto unable to make an argument (because the nazis were not real and there is not possibility that there could be a valid comparison between the conditions that allowed them to exist and conditions in current society-- because the nazis weren't real.)"