> I absolutely think that private organisations can effectively ban something without government intervention. I just don't think that happened here. Oh, absol

> I absolutely think that private organisations can effectively ban something without government intervention. I just don't think that happened here. Oh, absolutely. To be honest I'm not terribly interested in the specifics of this case, just the general idea that today, when so much communication happens on privately-owned platforms, corporate censorship is not censorship because only governments censor.