2 ms·
The performance cost is crazy when format string is parsed at runtime. Implementing all that subtle functionality correctly takes up a lot of CPU time. Accord
by vardump 11y ago
The performance cost is crazy when format string is parsed at runtime.
Implementing all that subtle functionality correctly takes up a lot of CPU time.
According to my quick test, on Visual Studio 2012, even simplest sprintf with just one parameter seemed to take about 1 microsecond to execute.
Of course clang and gcc seem to sometimes compile whole format parser away. At least...
printf ("Hello World!\n");
... is optimized into a simple "puts("Hello World!");".
Of course iostream << operator runtime performance is also pretty horrible. Each << invocation seem to call streambuf::sputn (or sputc) separately. On VS2012, simplest stringstream test...
ss << "value: " << intVal << endl;
... outputting one variable into it and turning the result into a std::string took about 3 microseconds. (Although it was a very quick test, a number of things might be suboptimal in the test code.)