5 ms·

Things I have to say: * Background noise in your video is annoying. * Why are you showing your face? I'd rather see your code bigger. * Using require instea

by GantMan 11y ago

Things I have to say: * Background noise in your video is annoying. * Why are you showing your face? I'd rather see your code bigger. * Using require instead of module imports shows me that this product is going to have trouble keeping pace with FB, Babel, ECMA speeds. * I'm not in love with adding another IDE * hello http://getqwikly.com/ http://getqwikly.com/ all over again Sorry, but I'm not betting on this horse.

pbreit 11y ago
Not the best feedback but not sure it's downvote-worthy
- deleted 11y ago
  [deleted]
s986s 11y ago
This product may die, however I believe competition and the fire to get what you want is more valuable than king making through bad reviews (whether intentional or unintentional). Tbh, Im not going to look at the product because Im more interested in terminal editors at the moment. But criticism should be used to enhamce a product, not degrade the blood sweat and tears that went into it
- GantMan 11y ago
  I applaud effort. I just feel there's some glaring gaps that make alarms go off. I'm sharing those. I know this looks fantastic, but that's when I start checking for a venire. And when I do, those smells popped up.
rpedela 11y ago
> Using require instead of module imports shows me that this product is going to have trouble keeping pace with FB, Babel, ECMA speeds. What does that mean?
- GantMan 11y ago
  Facebook releases so fast. So when something is brand new and it's already not using the latest, I feel afraid. The example project doesn't use the import syntax, it's using require, and feels like it's coming from ECMA5 in a brand new video. I just worry, can they keep up? Facebook releases breaking changes often so it's a valid concern.
  - peterhunt 11y ago
    Facebook, as well as most of the code out there, is still using CommonJS, since there are very real issues with ES6 modules that are still unresolved[1] [1] https://twitter.com/sebmck/status/692443162804092928 https://twitter.com/sebmck/status/692443162804092928
  - niftylettuce 11y ago
    100% agree, read my comments that everyone seemed to downvote because they're a fanboy of this noob IDE
  - rpedela 11y ago
    It seems like you are jumping to conclusions.

by GantMan 11y ago

pbreit 11y ago

Not the best feedback but not sure it's downvote-worthy

deleted 11y ago
[deleted]

s986s 11y ago

This product may die, however I believe competition and the fire to get what you want is more valuable than king making through bad reviews (whether intentional or unintentional). Tbh, Im not going to look at the product because Im more interested in terminal editors at the moment. But criticism should be used to enhamce a product, not degrade the blood sweat and tears that went into it

GantMan 11y ago
I applaud effort. I just feel there's some glaring gaps that make alarms go off. I'm sharing those. I know this looks fantastic, but that's when I start checking for a venire. And when I do, those smells popped up.

rpedela 11y ago

> Using require instead of module imports shows me that this product is going to have trouble keeping pace with FB, Babel, ECMA speeds. What does that mean?

GantMan 11y ago
Facebook releases so fast. So when something is brand new and it's already not using the latest, I feel afraid. The example project doesn't use the import syntax, it's using require, and feels like it's coming from ECMA5 in a brand new video. I just worry, can they keep up? Facebook releases breaking changes often so it's a valid concern.
- peterhunt 11y ago
  Facebook, as well as most of the code out there, is still using CommonJS, since there are very real issues with ES6 modules that are still unresolved[1] [1] https://twitter.com/sebmck/status/692443162804092928 https://twitter.com/sebmck/status/692443162804092928
- niftylettuce 11y ago
  100% agree, read my comments that everyone seemed to downvote because they're a fanboy of this noob IDE
- rpedela 11y ago
  It seems like you are jumping to conclusions.