> Eugenics is a policy proposal, not a fact. How could it possibly be part of the scientific consensus? It was a proposal for dealing with some "facts" and "th

> Eugenics is a policy proposal, not a fact. How could it possibly be part of the scientific consensus? It was a proposal for dealing with some "facts" and "theories" about which there was scientific consensus. BTW - Eugenics in the US was a progressive enterprise.