3 ms·
I love the current ad-based world that lets me get free access to premium content in exchange for ad views, I just don't want to be profiled. I'd be SUPER happ
by inanutshellus 11y ago
I love the current ad-based world that lets me get free access to premium content in exchange for ad views, I just don't want to be profiled.
I'd be SUPER happy to see ads that support a site that didn't track me.
- inanutshellus 11y agoHow about an ad company that doesn't track you? An ad company that was based on (as in, its mission statement) anonymous data or client-side-session-level tracking? The "problem" would be that current ads are SO tailored that they have a baseline click-through rate that'd be higher than one based solely on the content of the website. To solve that problem, how about client-side ad picker? (e.g. I download a score of ads from "nottrackingyouAdCompany.com" and a client-side JS solution chooses what to show, meaning my privacy is only "broken" on my own PC.)
- theseatoms 11y agoYes. Publishers are currently maximizing ad quality and content quantity instead of content quality.
- ethbro 11y agoI think the crux of the question though is: how many more ads at the same site would you be willing to see that don't track you? Given that a site's costs are fixed, but targeted ad's are worth more than untargeted.
- inanutshellus 11y agoWell the current number is zero..... So any number higher than that is a winner for both of us, right?