From what I know of it, Zucker's own report on patient outcomes doesn't come out showing much success, but I can't read it as I lack access to paid journals. Th

From what I know of it, Zucker's own report on patient outcomes doesn't come out showing much success, but I can't read it as I lack access to paid journals. There's also been published criticism of CAMH's practices. More to the point, why would Zucker persist with his own method when there actually is evidence for the conventional approach?