2 ms·

"Yes, if the content is good enough to warrant paying for a subscription. " So if it's not, you just view it anyway? "Nope, and there's no reason to muddy the

"Yes, if the content is good enough to warrant paying for a subscription. " So if it's not, you just view it anyway? "Nope, and there's no reason to muddy the waters with terms like crusade. " It's pretty rich to make a moral argument the way the parent did and have a problem with a term like crusade, which is a precise and correct term to describe this.

cyphar 11y ago
> > "Yes, if the content is good enough to warrant paying for a subscription. " > So if it's not, you just view it anyway? Yes, because I decide what authors and publications I choose to support based on what they publish. You might think I'm "taking free samples too far", but you can always flick through a magazine before buying it in a store -- what is the difference here? Paying for a publication when you have no idea what they produce is just being a bad consumer. > > "Nope, and there's no reason to muddy the waters with terms like crusade. " > It's pretty rich to make a moral argument the way the parent did and have a problem with a term like crusade, which is a precise and correct term to describe this. Well, to be fair GP made a similar moral argument, so I guess they also have a crusade?
- DannyBee 11y ago
  "Well, to be fair GP made a similar moral argument, so I guess they also have a crusade? " Sure. I don't discriminate.