3 ms·
I take a different view – Twitter is 'in trouble' because people expect it to be far more than it should be. It seems like it could be a really simple product
by matthewmacleod 11y ago
I take a different view – Twitter is 'in trouble' because people expect it to be far more than it should be.
It seems like it could be a really simple product – an asynchronous method to receive small updates, recommendations and so on from people or organisations you are interested in. And I love that! I follow a good selection of people who share things I am interested in. There's nothing wrong with that, and there's an obvious path (through advertising) to monetisation.
The problem is the wider perception of failure – the "Why isn't Twitter like Facebook!?!?" issue. Instead of a solid, well-delivered, sustainable product, we are witnessing a push for 'growth' and 'development' which I quite honestly think are exactly the opposite of what Twitter needs. What is frustrating me most about Twitter recently is:
- Poor technical choices (the Mac app is shit and they have repeatedly fucked over the technical community)
- Fucking-up of the core timeline concept (the introduction of the 'algorithmic timeline' will be the day I leave the platform)
- Arbitrarily inserting tweets from people I don't follow, nuking the whole point of it
I'd be much happier if they just slashed the headcount and built a sustainable business, but I guess that's not going to happen at this point.
- toyg 11y agoThey did slash headcount, but lower headcount does not necessarily mean better choices will be made, as the timeline shenanigans demonstrate. What they need to slash is the attitude of "owning the channel".