4 ms·
You shouldn't judge the progress on Sublime Text based on when the last "stable version" was released. They seem to be way too perfectionistic in deeming versio
by kristofferR 11y ago
You shouldn't judge the progress on Sublime Text based on when the last "stable version" was released. They seem to be way too perfectionistic in deeming version 3 stable - the developer versions have all been more stable for me than any version of Atom ever has been. The Sublime Text 3 betas are production ready.
It's true that the development progress has been really slow/halted this last year, but it seems to have gotten back on track in the last month.
- gbersac 11y agoThat's the reason why I consider sublime text to be superior to atom. I heard some people complain about few bugs, ie sublime not working on some linux distribution. Nothing happened to me. And sublime is FAST.
- fit2rule 11y agoFor me, speed is the reason I'm still using ST3 instead of switching to Atom 'like everyone else' .. Sublime simply is nice and fast. (One more thing: large file support is just better..)
- doktrin 11y agoYeah. I've experienced way more problems with Atom than I ever have with Sublime (as a user). Crazy performance issues and crashes on literally every platform I've installed it on (including Windows and OSX). I agree with the parent in the sense that with Atom's resources and more extensible, modern design they will eventually have a superior product - but right now I keep finding reasons not to use it.