3 ms·
Sure. Every analytics company tries to differentiate themselves by claiming that they do something the others don't and showing off some pretty charts. The ma
by Falkon1313 11y ago
Sure. Every analytics company tries to differentiate themselves by claiming that they do something the others don't and showing off some pretty charts.
The marketers buy the hype and want all of that. "If I take this pretty chart from here, and that table that from there, and these numbers from over here, I can make a really impressive report!"
And they want to make sure that they're collecting all the data they could possibly be collecting (because they never know when they might suddenly need the last 6 months data about something they never thought of), even though they don't know what queries they want to be able to make.
So they make the developers add all of them, end up with tons of data but very little information, and start talking about 'this big data thing' that could maybe give them answers even though they still don't know what questions they want to ask. And to use it, you just have to add this little snippet of javascript...
- soared 11y agoIt sounds like the points you're making are all negative, but it also sounds like a fairly valid argument to me. Sure marketers add too much js with the allure of big data, but whats the cost? 0.1% of users (hn readers and the like) are annoyed by it? I'd gladly piss off a tiny fraction of my users to better understand the other 99.9%.