3 ms·
Read the article. It's not about being enforceable. It's about having a liability if someone is under such an non-compete.
by chinathrow 11y ago
Read the article. It's not about being enforceable. It's about having a liability if someone is under such an non-compete.
- hodgesrm 11y agoI did. :) The liability would not exist if the non-compete were unenforceable as it is in places like California.
- chinathrow 11y agoNo, even if it's unenforceable across the globe it would increase the risk of litigation. Hence a liability.