3 ms·
I am not a lawyer but I believe this is because there is a tort for inducing someone to break their contract with a third party. Therefore as the new employer t
by bravo22 11y ago
I am not a lawyer but I believe this is because there is a tort for inducing someone to break their contract with a third party. Therefore as the new employer they'd be on the hook.
- stygiansonic 11y agoEven when the new employer has not been sued, there are cases where they have paid the previous employer to settle the non-compete, as was the case with a CEO Nortel hired from Motorola: "The two companies were involved in a brief legal dispute last year after Nortel announced it had chosen Motorola's former chief operating officer, Mike Zafirovski, as its next CEO. Citing non-compete agreements, Motorola sued Zafirovski in October. The dispute was settled a few days later when Nortel agreed to pay $11.5 million to end the matter. Under the terms of that October settlement, Zafirovski and Nortel agreed not to recruit Motorola employees." (Not trying to say this case is anything like that of a much lower-level journalist as described in the article. That seems unfair and harsh) http://www.infoworld.com/article/2674269/networking/nortel-appoints-ex-motorola-exec-as-operations-chief.html http://www.infoworld.com/article/2674269/networking/nortel-a...