Projects have to drive unbelievers out to work. Well, partly. It does not matter if someone is just not believing in one specific aspect of the project and igno

Projects have to drive unbelievers out to work. Well, partly. It does not matter if someone is just not believing in one specific aspect of the project and ignores it. That is fine. But when the group starts to fight over what to do instead and this agreement can't be reached, then a split is necessary to enable common work of the people left. Of course that can't work when the project has no working governance, if the project has not even a clear goal. If a project is only defending against unbelievers without having a consensus of its own. And I think that is what he is mainly describing here, without me being sure that is fully intended.