5 ms·

This is something I would both love to develop something for but could never allow into my house. I know I could do both but it feels kind of wrong to make anyt

This is something I would both love to develop something for but could never allow into my house. I know I could do both but it feels kind of wrong to make anything that might encourage other people to have one given the terrifying privacy implications.

IanCal 11y ago
You might want to have a look at jasper: http://jasperproject.github.io/ http://jasperproject.github.io/ You can use an offline speech recognition engine in that.
- StavrosK 11y ago
  How well does it work? I think recognition latency is pretty large.
  - colinramsay 11y ago
    It has different speech recognition back-ends so it depends on which you use.
    - StavrosK 11y ago
      AFAIK PocketSphinx is the only engine that doesn't send all your audio over the internet, which is the only acceptable use case for me. I'll try training Julius, though, it sounds like it may be the best solution to the problem.
  - CaptSpify 11y ago
    I use this. Yes, latency is kind of big, but it's tolerable. The big difference for me is that you have to program every command. I've never used the Echo, but my understanding is that it has a ton of pre-built commands that you can use: set a timer, what is the weather, play somesong, etc. For jasper (pocketsphinx) you have to manually program the action for all of these. So it's a lot more setup. I still like it and use it all the time though.
    - mk4p 11y ago
      How do you find yourself using it?
      - CaptSpify 11y ago
        I do a few things: control music (pause/play, volume up/down, etc), change my lights (dim, bright, color), read off the weather, ask what time it is. I've got a few other ideas: control my roku, add milk to the grocery list, read emails, etc. Nothing life-changing, but fun stuff that makes small parts of my day easier.
  - roel_v 11y ago
    What I dislike about Jasper is how it deals with modality: you have to say 'Jasper', wait for it to recognize that and confirm to you it's gone into 'listen' mode, then say the actual command. This delay is what made it not acceptable from a ux perspectice. I prefer to have all my commands prefixed with the keyword (I use 'computer' but from what I read online, 'jarvis' is a more popular choice...) Jasper also writes audio to disk, then runs command line tools on those files. I haven't tested if this is a significant source of latency.

IanCal 11y ago

You might want to have a look at jasper: http://jasperproject.github.io/ http://jasperproject.github.io/ You can use an offline speech recognition engine in that.

StavrosK 11y ago
How well does it work? I think recognition latency is pretty large.
- colinramsay 11y ago
  It has different speech recognition back-ends so it depends on which you use.
  - StavrosK 11y ago
    AFAIK PocketSphinx is the only engine that doesn't send all your audio over the internet, which is the only acceptable use case for me. I'll try training Julius, though, it sounds like it may be the best solution to the problem.
- CaptSpify 11y ago
  I use this. Yes, latency is kind of big, but it's tolerable. The big difference for me is that you have to program every command. I've never used the Echo, but my understanding is that it has a ton of pre-built commands that you can use: set a timer, what is the weather, play somesong, etc. For jasper (pocketsphinx) you have to manually program the action for all of these. So it's a lot more setup. I still like it and use it all the time though.
  - mk4p 11y ago
    How do you find yourself using it?
    - CaptSpify 11y ago
      I do a few things: control music (pause/play, volume up/down, etc), change my lights (dim, bright, color), read off the weather, ask what time it is. I've got a few other ideas: control my roku, add milk to the grocery list, read emails, etc. Nothing life-changing, but fun stuff that makes small parts of my day easier.
- roel_v 11y ago
  What I dislike about Jasper is how it deals with modality: you have to say 'Jasper', wait for it to recognize that and confirm to you it's gone into 'listen' mode, then say the actual command. This delay is what made it not acceptable from a ux perspectice. I prefer to have all my commands prefixed with the keyword (I use 'computer' but from what I read online, 'jarvis' is a more popular choice...) Jasper also writes audio to disk, then runs command line tools on those files. I haven't tested if this is a significant source of latency.