> I enjoy that Rust just decided to change their "try" syntax for calling a function that could possibly fail to a simpler "?" suffix, and now we get Duffy prai

> I enjoy that Rust just decided to change their "try" syntax for calling a function that could possibly fail to a simpler "?" suffix, and now we get Duffy praising how well "try" worked out for them. :P The Rust community did no such thing. The status of the RFC is currently that they will implement '?' as a gated feature (which is only available if you're on the nightly toolchain) and see if it is useful. If it's found to obfuscate the code like many people have suggested, then they will take it back out.