I commonly have academic computer science papers rejected for a variety of these reasons. That is, the reviewers do not have any factual or methodology concerns

I commonly have academic computer science papers rejected for a variety of these reasons. That is, the reviewers do not have any factual or methodology concerns; they don't think we're wrong, or that we made any mistakes designing our experiments. They just don't like it. I've started to call these "Your baby is ugly" reviews.