3 ms·
Wow, I never knew about that. I always hated having std:: everywhere, just so I could have "correct" C++. But I also hated referencing to std implicitly. Thi
by 2bitencryption 11y ago
Wow, I never knew about that. I always hated having std:: everywhere, just so I could have "correct" C++. But I also hated referencing to std implicitly. This is the perfect tradeoff: explicitly state intentions in the beginning, then implicitly reference them as you go. (works until you use eighty five billion lines just to import your symbols)