5 ms·
Perhaps the user doesn't want his/her web browsing experience to be the awful, bloated, slow, tracking-laden experience that javascript has made it into for the
by na85 11y ago
Perhaps the user doesn't want his/her web browsing experience to be the awful, bloated, slow, tracking-laden experience that javascript has made it into for the rest of us.
I for one applaud this individual.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- bastawhiz 11y agoHe's using Opera 10. The one with a built in IRC client, mail client, bittorrent client, Web server, widget system, and loads more. He's using, by far, the most bloated and slow browser ever created. He's not choosing a lighter experience, he's choosing a slower and more broken one (as evidenced by the fact that it can't even load one of the most popular websites in the world correctly).
- Symbiote 11y agoIt had all those things, and you can call that bloat if you wish, but at the time it was decently fast. http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-and-opera-10-take-on-all-challengers http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-... for example, or https://ktetch.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/benchmarking-browsers-how-does-opera-10-60-stack-up/ https://ktetch.wordpress.com/2010/07/05/benchmarking-browser...
- rasz_pl 11y agoGet back to us when you can load 100 (one hundred) tabs in under 2.5GB of ram and maintain snappy experience on 7 year old 2core/3GHz computer.