3 ms·
Obviously, that's why the Github description says: > That being said, maybe should :warning: NEVER :warning: be used to run untrusted code on a system you care
by DavideNL 11y ago
Obviously, that's why the Github description says:
> That being said, maybe should :warning: NEVER :warning: be used to run untrusted code on a system you care about! A process running under maybe can still do serious damage to your system because only a handful of syscalls are blocked. Currently, maybe is best thought of as an (alpha-quality) "what exactly will this command I typed myself do?" tool.
- jacobparker 11y agoYou've missed Paul's point I think. Even running trusted code is unlikely to work as desired (and could still have negative consequences due to what isn't included in the "sandbox") for anything other than trivial programs.
- DavideNL 11y agoI understood. Obviously the author knows about these limitations, otherwise he wouldn't be able to write such a tool... but still it can be useful; It's alpha, the tool can be used on trivial programs and you should be aware of its limitations.