4 ms·

I got 9/10. Chose the first one incorrectly. For me, the giveaway for computer-generated images was that they don't focus on the "subject" and have too much de

I got 9/10. Chose the first one incorrectly. For me, the giveaway for computer-generated images was that they don't focus on the "subject" and have too much detail on the background. For example, look at the computer-generated boats - they blend into the background. It's hard to tell where the boat ends and the rocks begin, or where the sails end and the clouds begin. Or look at the grey house in front of the dude's face or the pipe behind the glasses lady's head, which bring in too much attention but add nothing to the painting.

kang 11y ago
Yesterday I was reading this blogpost (http://maryrosecook.com/blog/post/scarface-prince-of-the-city-and-pieter-de-hooch http://maryrosecook.com/blog/post/scarface-prince-of-the-cit...) so as soon as I clicked this link I thought no way can a computer learn to do what I read yesterday on its own! I had read headlines about computer-generated images but had never seen them, yet I managed 9/10, anticipating that an artist's technique is not just relation between color etc. but a philosophy. Edit: Also, it is not a turing test in true sense, since it's one sided. It would be turing test if I tell them what to draw & then it's tough to distinguish between what an artist & computer paints.
franciscop 11y ago
For me the giveaway in some of them were that the computer-generated ones were "from a photograph". So, the woman with the hair up in an impossible position was a human-generated one [1], for example. Also, the ones that looked more photograph-like were also computer generated. For instance, compare [2] and [3] [1] http://turing.deepart.io/t/4.jpg http://turing.deepart.io/t/4.jpg [2] http://turing.deepart.io/t/1.jpg http://turing.deepart.io/t/1.jpg [3] http://turing.deepart.io/f/3.png http://turing.deepart.io/f/3.png
natmaster 11y ago
Same here. The first one was hard, I spent a long time and ended up getting that as the only wrong one. They mostly looked like real photos with a filter applied, which gave it away pretty easy.

kang 11y ago

Yesterday I was reading this blogpost (http://maryrosecook.com/blog/post/scarface-prince-of-the-city-and-pieter-de-hooch http://maryrosecook.com/blog/post/scarface-prince-of-the-cit...) so as soon as I clicked this link I thought no way can a computer learn to do what I read yesterday on its own! I had read headlines about computer-generated images but had never seen them, yet I managed 9/10, anticipating that an artist's technique is not just relation between color etc. but a philosophy. Edit: Also, it is not a turing test in true sense, since it's one sided. It would be turing test if I tell them what to draw & then it's tough to distinguish between what an artist & computer paints.

franciscop 11y ago

For me the giveaway in some of them were that the computer-generated ones were "from a photograph". So, the woman with the hair up in an impossible position was a human-generated one [1], for example. Also, the ones that looked more photograph-like were also computer generated. For instance, compare [2] and [3] [1] http://turing.deepart.io/t/4.jpg http://turing.deepart.io/t/4.jpg [2] http://turing.deepart.io/t/1.jpg http://turing.deepart.io/t/1.jpg [3] http://turing.deepart.io/f/3.png http://turing.deepart.io/f/3.png

natmaster 11y ago

Same here. The first one was hard, I spent a long time and ended up getting that as the only wrong one. They mostly looked like real photos with a filter applied, which gave it away pretty easy.