5 ms·
So, this person claims to be for the working class, then effectively harasses some poor shlub on the phone who's probably getting paid minimum wage to read thei
by CurtHagenlocher 11y ago
So, this person claims to be for the working class, then effectively harasses some poor shlub on the phone who's probably getting paid minimum wage to read their script?
- sambe 11y agoI'm not sure how you're framing that as a class issue. Her concerns were about the dishonesty, and it sounds like the supervisor or Clinton herself would have got the same treatment.
- tamana 11y agoThe author should have asked to speak with the supervisor or Clinton herself.
- tlrobinson 11y agoHe did. The supervisor never called back.
- fnordfnordfnord 11y agoDidn't they?
- jonquark 11y agoDo you think it is inconsistent to be in favour of policies "for the working class" and have issues with someone doing something you think is reprehensible if that person is on minimum wage and they were "just following orders"?
- CurtHagenlocher 11y agoI think there are a lot of people who are for an abstract idea of the working class but don't have much empathy for real human beings who have to make tough decisions in order to put food on the table. "I could destroy any one of your arguments in just a couple of seconds. Do you realize you are talking to someone with a degree in political science who has probably written more about politics than everyone in your office put together?" Oookay. Also, nice Godwin.
- jonquark 11y agoI agree with you that the tone of the article distracts from the allegation that is being made.