3 ms·
From the article > 2. Security is improved as the image has a smaller footprint thus making the attack surface also smaller Not saying you need to agree with t
by hiou 11y ago
From the article
> 2. Security is improved as the image has a smaller footprint thus making the attack surface also smaller
Not saying you need to agree with that. But that does appear to be at least an "indication"
- jmspring 11y agoImage footprint has nothing to do with the packages installed in that image. This is complete hogwash from a security point of view. Yes "smaller" could = "more secure", but, yeah, no.
- nickpsecurity 11y agoRemind them that DOS was pretty small. Must be way more secure than Linux due to reduced attack surface. ;)