3 ms·
I didn't want to make the point that it was NEVER warranted -- just that it was very rare for it to happen. Obviously, people do get into disagreements that may
by hardwaresofton 11y ago
I didn't want to make the point that it was NEVER warranted -- just that it was very rare for it to happen. Obviously, people do get into disagreements that may even turn violent in person. My point is that if someone isn't in your scenario (which I suspect most are not, they're just piling on with the "down with all telemarketers" bandwagon), they should look to other options, before making someone else's life very difficult through technology.
- pavel_lishin 11y ago"very difficult"? I'm not casting a nam-shub on them; I'm just giving them the option of talking on the phone, which is literally what they get paid to do. Like I said in my comment above, it's not cruelty.
- hardwaresofton 11y agoYou basically picked up on two words out of the entire comment, then misquoted me (I did not call it cruel)... My point is simple, you're choosing to be rude, and that is fine, completely your choice (especially given what you've stated about what it's like where you live). But that reaction is not necessarily warranted for the person that gets 1 call every few months from a telemarketer.
- pavel_lishin 11y ago> (I did not call it cruel)... Sorry, I was quoting myself. And I'd argue that what warrants the reaction is how many calls the telemarketer is making, not how many the receiver is picking up.
- tamana 11y agoBravo, you have done an incredible long troll job, posting in the forum like a telemarketer talks on the phone, pushing BS motte&bailey logic to trick or wear down people.