3 ms·
http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/10/26/facebooks-memcached-multiget-hole-more-machines-more-capacit.html http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/10/26/facebook
by stephenjudkins 17y ago
http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/10/26/facebooks-memcached-multiget-hole-more-machines-more-capacit.html http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/10/26/facebooks-memcach... would indicate that Facebook's memcached instances are sometimes CPU-bound. They've submitted several patches to Memcached to improve its performance so that would back that up as well.
I've wondered the same thing--compression would be enormously helpful to us since we're RAM-bound (even with tons of RAM) and store a lot of easily compressible HTML. Further, our memcached instances show almost no CPU load.
- cmallen 17y agoWell, I guess for their scale, CPU-limiting factors would make compression not worthwhile. That said, for more common scaling issues, I think compression would be a huge win, especially with Redis-style backends.
- messel 17y agoThanks Stephen, great info and highly relevant the scale issues.