4 ms·

Well, yes, to a large degree. A famous, reputable news source is generally going to provide better quality service than smaller media outlets.

• x5n1 11y ago
  Perhaps higher quality of more believable propaganda and rhetoric, rather than your run of the mill critical drivel that comes out of academic circles so you can feel better about life? > A famous, reputable news source is generally going to provide better quality service than smaller media outlets. To who, their customers i.e. advertisers? Or to you, their product? There is a reason they are famous and reputable, and it does not have to do with found most trustworthy by a panel of educated, well informed experts. As George Orwell said, “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.”
  • phpnode 11y ago
    The burden of knowlege must rest heavy on your shoulders, if only other people were as capable of critical thinking as you are the world would be a better place... Seriously though feel free to keep your ill-informed assumptions to yourself.
    • deleted 11y ago
      [deleted]
    • x5n1 11y ago
      If it's not true then why are you so offended by comment enough to tell me to "keep my ill-informed assumptions to myself". At some level you must believe what I said to be true or at least offensive to your held world view.
      • phpnode 11y ago
        I was reacting to your assumption that I blindly accept the news as reported as truth, in order to "feel better about life" in your words. You don't know anything about me.