3 ms·
No, I am replying to a concrete argument. I quoted it at the top of my post. That the family-work ratio cannot be extreme, and is very much a personal tradeoff
by Radim 11y ago
No, I am replying to a concrete argument. I quoted it at the top of my post.
That the family-work ratio cannot be extreme, and is very much a personal tradeoff, was the whole point of my post. I am baffled -- what exactly are you arguing against? It seems you're agreeing with a vengeance.
- moron4hire 11y agoNo, you're making absurd assumptions to be able to make a pedantic argument.
- Radim 11y agoOut of curiosity -- how was I supposed to read your original comment? What I saw was the OP saying "I saved time commuting, all good" (doh). Then you came in with "no way you could pay me to give up family time", which sounds extremely... extreme. If that wasn't the core of your message, what was? What are the absurd assumptions?