4 ms·
Courts have been dealing with clever nitpickers like yourself for centuries. All of these would be hyperlinks according to the courts, and if you tried to argue
by avar 11y ago
Courts have been dealing with clever nitpickers like yourself for centuries. All of these would be hyperlinks according to the courts, and if you tried to argue otherwise you'd be told that you were trying to make a "distinction without a difference".
- rambambam 11y agoHe is just curious at the specific definition the court is going to come up with. Were do they draw the line and how would they capture that in words?
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- im2w1l 11y agoPeople have earned a lot of money by nitpicking laws.
- pyre 11y agoIt cuts both ways though. A judge could easily expand the definition of what a hyperlink was beyond what is reasonable due to vagueness in the law because the "reasonable person" test takes account for the people that think changing their desktop wallpaper is "magic" performed by "computer geniuses."