> I think it's pretty clear that the bar for safety must be much higher (10x) than human-level for these to be accepted by consumers. You might be right about

> I think it's pretty clear that the bar for safety must be much higher (10x) than human-level for these to be accepted by consumers. You might be right about that, I just don't see why it should be the case. Humans are not very good at driving safely, it seems like an easy bar for robots to clear. Even if robots are "only" twice as safe, we should all jump at the opportunity to halve injuries and deaths from auto accidents.