This is a great point. If you're running a small site with mostly static content, then you don't need all this dynamic stuff. Yes, it's fun to work with in, i

This is a great point. If you're running a small site with mostly static content, then you don't need all this dynamic stuff. Yes, it's fun to work with in, in a certain way, but it's like using a nuclear missile to swat a housefly. Seems like a lot of people being a bit depressed that they're not working on a big problem and hence trying to make even the simplest websites into gigantic software development projects. The point about WYSIWYG editors is interesting, though I suspect the complexity of generating decent HTML/CSS/Javascript/whatever is what originally killed them. That said, surely someone is able to figure out a decent system now, right? 2015 technology has to be at the point where a program can figure out how to code a (semantic, well coded) layout in CSS, right?