3 ms·

Because it discriminates based the nationality of who you marry. If you marry someone from the EU the rules do not apply.

• thawkins 11y ago
  Of course its discrimatory, it discriminates in the favor of british and eu citizens, is that wrong? Are we saying that non citizens have the same rights of entry as citizens? I live in the far east, in order to qualify for a residency visa, i have to show assets of at least $50,000. In fact i have to bind that in an accredited savings account. So minimum asset determinatiins for residency qualification is common and not a vile abnormality as sugested.
  • Someone1234 11y ago
    > Of course its discrimatory, it discriminates in the favor of british and eu citizens, is that wrong? You have that backwards. British citizens are the ones it harms, they're the ones who cannot see their spouse or child. > Are we saying that non citizens have the same rights of entry as citizens? Dependants of British nationals should have the same rights, yes. > So minimum asset determinatiins for residency qualification is common and not a vile abnormality as sugested. We are talking about visas to bring a spouse or child into the country, you're talking about something else entirely. I don't see the connection. I also have no idea what country or visa type you're even referring to.